Super Bowl 59 odds have been extremely quiet since opening, with very little line movement for both the spread and over/under.
Here at Action Network our experts, software and tools provide the angles, edges, analysis and picks you need to make the smartest Super Bowl 59 bets, so dig in!
But for the purposes of this article, we're going to look at the latest Super Bowl odds, then predict the best ways to approach the Chiefs vs. Eagles spread and over/unders depending on which of these picks you like.
How to Bet Super Bowl 59
| Chiefs Odds | ||
|---|---|---|
| Spread | Total | Moneyline |
-1 -105 | 48.5 -110o / -110u | -110 |
| Eagles Odds | ||
|---|---|---|
| Spread | Total | Moneyline |
+1 -115 | 48.5 -110o / -110u | -110 |
Odds as of Friday, Feb. 7, from Caesars Sportsbook
If you like the Chiefs spread …
Wait.
Kansas City is a 1.5-spread favorite at most sportsbooks — however, some shops, like Caesars and Circa in Las Vegas, which is known for accepting large wagers from respected bettors, have dipped to Chiefs +1.
Additionally, Action PRO's Super Bowl projections set the Chiefs vs. Eagles spread at Kansas City -0.7, meaning this line could continue to move toward our projection.
Bottom line: At the very least, grab the Chiefs -1 if you want to lock it in now, and considering there aren't any key numbers at play here, you can even wait to see if this spread shortens even more.
If you like the Eagles spread …
Take Eagles +1.5 (-110) now.
Again, there's no way to be 100% sure how a line will move, but as I just detailed above, the market is starting to move off +1.5 to +1, headlined by Circa.
If you like the over …
There's more clarity regarding how to bet the Super Bowl 59 over/under right now simply because there is variance across the market.
For example, Fanatics has the Chiefs vs. Eagles total at 48.5 (-110), so don't settle for 49 or 49.5 with this 48.5 (-110) so easily accessible.
If you like the under …
Conversely, why take under 48.5 at Fanatics when bet365 has it a full point higher at 49.5 (-110)?
That's right, you wouldn't.
