2022 March Madness Odds: Least Profitable NCAA Tournament Teams Against the Spread (ATS) This Season

2022 March Madness Odds: Least Profitable NCAA Tournament Teams Against the Spread (ATS) This Season article feature image
Credit:

Photo by Kevin Langley/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images. Pictured: Jaden Shackelford (Alabama)

If you're betting on March Madness, do so with the best data.

With this particular dataset — the worst teams against the spread (ATS) — there are two schools of thought.

One side will argue that because these teams have underperformed relative to the market over a relatively lengthy sample size, they should be faded by all means necessary. The market systemically overvalues them.

Another school of thought would say teams that have underachieved against the spread are due to positively regress toward the mean at any moment.

Whichever side of this argument you fall on, it helps to know, first, which March Madness teams are worst against the spread — and which are best.

Tourney Promos: Claim $3,500+ FREE This Week!

Bet $10, Win $200 on any ML!

Get $1,100 if your first bet loses!

… and more!

The top four teams that have underperformed relative to the market are from big conferences — naturally. Teams with big followings from major conferences are going to be more overrated than an anonymous mid-major.

Leading this pack this season are the Alabama Crimson Tide, who went 11-20 against the spread. If you had bet $100 on each of their games, you'd be down $1,000.

Next up is another southern school in Texas. While they're the No. 15 team in the country, according to KenPom, they've drastically underperformed their market price. They've gone 10-17-1 ATS. A $100 bettor would have lost $791 betting for the Longhorns to cover every game.

Next up are the Michigan Wolverines, who have underperformed in both a traditional and statistical sense. Many were surprised to see them sneak in with a bye from the First Four — it seems they did so based on pedigree alone. A strong strength of schedule and wins over a few top teams doesn't hurt, either.

A surprise pick in this bunch are Loyola Chicago, which the market and advanced metrics love. Loyola is ranked No. 24 in the nation by the metrics despite never sniffing the AP Top 25 poll all season.

They went a fifth-worst 10-16-3 ATS this season. A $100 bettor would have lost $702 betting on every Rambler game.

Below is a table of the worst eight teams against the spread during the regular season.

TeamATS RecordProfit for $100 bettor
Alabama11-20-$1,000
Texas10-17-1-$791
Michigan12-18-$713
Purdue12-18-1-$710
Loyola Chicago10-16-3-$702
Illinois12-17-$629
Seton Hall11-16-$599
UConn10-15-1-$588
The must-have app for college basketball bettors

The best NCAAB betting scoreboard

Free picks from proven pros

Live win probabilities for your bets
About the Author
Avery Yang is a General Editor at The Action Network and a recent graduate from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. He has written for the Washington Post, the Associated Press, Sports Illustrated, (the old) Deadspin, MLB.com and others.

Follow Avery Yang @avery_yang on Twitter/X.

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Action Network makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.