College Football Week 1 Betting Trends: How Huge Spread Favorites Perform Early in the Season

College Football Week 1 Betting Trends: How Huge Spread Favorites Perform Early in the Season article feature image
Credit:

Photo by David Purdy/Getty Images. Pictured: Lincoln Riley

The unpredictable is as unpredictable as ever in Week 1 of college football thanks to the sixth-year eligibility, the transfer portal and last year's COVID season.

That's why the slightest of edges are important to find.

Those edges can come in a variety of ways and paired with historical data can uncover potential trends.

There are two trends worth exploring in the first month of the season that based on past recent performance have stood out as profitable.

The first? Huge underdogs.

Counting Thursday night's games, underdogs of at least 28 points are 190-147-6 against the spread (ATS) in August and September since 2016.

That's a profitable 56.4% cover rate.

On Thursday night, five huge favorites covered: Buffalo (-43.5), Coastal Carolina (-33.5), FIU (-34.5), San Jose State (-28) and Fresno State (-28).

Four huge favorites — including two heavily bet in Tennessee (-37) and Arizona State (-44.5) — did not. Ball State (-31.5) and Utah (-28.5) were the others. At DraftKings, 65% of the money was on the Vols, who failed to cover for the eighth time in their last 12 chances as a favorites of 28.

While teams favored by 28 or more enter the weekend 5-4 ATS, 20 more opportunities lie immediately ahead on games with spreads of at least 28.

Favorites of 28 points or more in Week 1

FavoriteUnderdogSpread
TCUDuquesne49.5
Boston CollegeColgate49.5
NebraskaFordham41.5
South CarolinaEastern Illinois40.5
ColoradoNorthern Colorado38
PittUMass38
ToledoNorfolk State37
Oklahoma StateMissouri State36.5
AuburnAkron36.5
VirginiaWilliam & Mary33.5
Eastern MichiganSt. Francis32.5
Wake ForestOld Dominion32
OklahomaTulane31.5
Iowa StateNorthern Iowa31.5
San Diego StateNew Mexico State31.5
KentuckyUL-Monroe31
SMUAbilene Christian30.5
Texas A&MKent State29
Georgia SouthernGardner Webb28.5

The other trend that shows a bit of profitability over recent years is the under on 65. Among possible reasons is it takes time for oddsmakers to catch up to coordinator changes and instead base opening lines off the previous year's data.

In the last five years, counting Thursday night's games, totals 65 or higher in August and September are going under at a 56% clip (144-113-3).

Week 1 Games with a total 65 or higher

MatchupTotal
Louisville vs. Ole Miss75.5
Memphis vs. Nicholls State69.5
Purdue vs. Oregon State69
Texas A&M vs. Kent State67.5
Oklahoma vs. Tulsa67.5
Michigan vs. Western Michigan66.5
SMU vs. Abilene Christian66.5
Arkansas St. vs. Central Arkansas65.5
LSU vs. UCLA65

Trends are just one tool to use when filling out your betting card. In general, trends should not be followed blindly. But if you have a lean one way or another and are looking for another data point, these trends have shown a profit in recent seasons.

In Week 1, any bit of data can help.

The ultimate CFB betting cheat code

Best bets for every game

Collin Wilson's biggest weekly edges

Profitable data-driven system picks
About the Author
Darren is a Senior Executive Producer at The Action Network, covering all angles of the sports betting world. He spent two stints at ESPN, from 2000-06 and 2012-18, he regularly wrote for ESPN.com and contributed to ESPN shows, including SportsCenter and Outside The Lines. He also served as a business correspondent for ABC News, where he made appearances on the network’s flagship shows, including “Good Morning America,” “World News Tonight” and “Nightline.” While at CNBC from 2006-2012, Rovell anchored five primetime documentaries, including “Swoosh! Inside Nike,” which was nominated for an Emmy. Rovell also contributed to NBC News, where he earned an Emmy as a correspondent for the network’s Presidential Election coverage.

Follow Darren Rovell @darrenrovell on Twitter/X.

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Action Network makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.